0435 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 20 July 2009
KHOODEELAAR! telling all ETHNIC SURROGATES in Brown-fronted Blaired regime in the UK to steer clear of lying for CRASS Crossrail scam.....
Sunday 19 July 2009
Saturday 18 July 2009
KHOODEELAAR! noting the 4th anniversary of the 2nd reading by UK MPs to CROSSRAIL Bill in the Palace of Ghostminster
KHOODEELAAR! noting the 4th anniversary of the 2nd reading by UK MPs to CROSSRAIL Bill in the Palace of Ghostminster on 19 July 2005..
To be continued]
Saturday 28 July 2007
A brief constituency biography of Mr George Galloway MP -1
A brief political biography of Mr George Galloway MP [‘for Bethnal green and Bow’ in the UK House of Commons since May 2005] as composed by a member of the constituency in ‘Bethnal Green and Bow’ written and published at 0230 Hrs GMT on Sunday 29 July 2007
By©Muhammad Haque
0230 Hrs GMT London Sunday 29 July 2007
One of the physical, material and evidential factors that has to be taken into account in assessing the relevant role of the present ‘MP’ for Bethnal Green and Bow, is the fact that he has received wider appearances in the West-controlled media [that has been imposed upon the rest of the world generally and upon Asia in particular in this context] than any other West-centric ‘personality’ or ‘figure’ in the media.
In fact he has been given wider and deeper promotions than ALL the ‘Muslim’-originated activists from all of Asia and Africa have been given in the past 100 years by the Western media and platform-controllers.
This is physically phenomenal in the sheer pervasiveness. But the substance is mercifully far smaller and is therefore manageable.
But an objective [or as nearly objective as possible, within the frameworks of rational] analysis of Mr Galloway’s ‘contributions’ ABOUT the Muslims in fact shows that he has not been an advocate of the rights of the Muslims in the context of the ideological battle between the colonialists and their victims or targets.
Rather that he has been, and remains, an advocate of the West in all key long term issues and matters.
His apparent departure from the policies of the regimes of GW Bush and Tony Blair occurs on a difference between what he, Mr George Galloway, says should happen on a particular aspect of the policies and what these regimes and their likes do or have done or are still doing.
This applies to Gordon Brown’s UK administration in so far as Brown may still be continuing what in effect and in substance would be the polices of the administration fronted by Tony Blair. After all, it is only four weeks or so since Blair ‘left’ and Gordon Brown officially took over at the official address fronting as the head of the UK administration.
So how is it that Mr Galloway comes across – or has been presented in the Western--controlled and Western imperialists-scripted media as coming across - both as an advocate of the rights of the Muslims as well as being [almost like] any stereotyped fundamentalist Muslim?
This is part of the plan that the media operate when they include Mr Galloway as one of their ‘official’ dissenters "allowed to speak on behalf of the Muslims”!
And as far as the allegations go that Mr Galloway has been a paid mouthpiece of Saddam Hussein or of anyone else, there is less difficulty in coming to a truthful and credible conclusion as to what Mr Galloway has been involved in as a general orientation in that regard.
Mr Galloway has openly taken part in comparatively small scale enterprises which have included references and recommendations as based on or as linked to his engagements and relationships with various parties or quarters near or close to heads of regimes in countries including Iraq.
Evidence of this is found in Mr Galloway’s relationships with the regime – and the person – of Benazir Bhutto from Pakistan.
In fact Mr Galloway is noticeably aptly representative of the viewpoint that would be accurately found in any on the given issue or topic as held by Benazir Bhutto even in 2007.
These small scale enterprises have brought Mr Galloway reasonable income and more to the point, these have allowed Mr Galloway a platform that he would otherwise not have. Platforms that have been used as important references in the colonialists’ propaganda that by their [the colonialists and occupiers] allowing Mr Galloway to speak, they are PROVING that there is freedom of speech for those who do not agree with the colonialists’ policies and practices.
This has been so since Mr Galloway’s present employers – or one set of his present employers outside the House of Commons – those who own the ‘Talksport’ broadcasting business where Mr Galloway hosts a twice weekly weekend phone-in slot broadcast this assertion.
Which is more telling than they would appear to have realised.
For the ‘Talksport’ station is one of the most racist, pro-racism, pro-occupation-of-Iraq outlets that could be found anywhere in the West.
And some of the ‘regulars’ including James Whale, are known promoters of the very same racist ideology that GW Bush in essence would agree with. And Tony Blair would be proud of!
This does not mean that since he got presented with a part-time ‘colleague’ as a co-host of a programme on the same slot, James Whale has not adopted a suitably vague style and phraseology when it comes to accommodating the unique arrangement.
And Mr Galloway has deployed his own presentational skills to complement Whale as his ‘teacher’ which Mr Whale would be immensely aware of, even if it could only have been conceived of and bestowed as a professional fiction!
And James Whale is not, by any stretch of the evidence, the most strident of today’s Talksport presenters!
Some of the things that they daily say and encourage when it comes to the ‘rest of the world generally and the Muslim people in particular’ would not only be identical with those of the BNP and their earlier versions the NF but would in fact be more offensive, more racist, more xenophobic, more anti-Asian, anti-African, anti-immigrant [!] and anti-Muslim than anything the official BNP or the NF would be allowed to include in any of THEIR Party Political Broadcasts on the BBC and on other official UK broadcasting outlets.!
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0230 Hrs GMT London Sunday 29 July 2007
One of the physical, material and evidential factors that has to be taken into account in assessing the relevant role of the present ‘MP’ for Bethnal Green and Bow, is the fact that he has received wider appearances in the West-controlled media [that has been imposed upon the rest of the world generally and upon Asia in particular in this context] than any other West-centric ‘personality’ or ‘figure’ in the media.
In fact he has been given wider and deeper promotions than ALL the ‘Muslim’-originated activists from all of Asia and Africa have been given in the past 100 years by the Western media and platform-controllers.
This is physically phenomenal in the sheer pervasiveness. But the substance is mercifully far smaller and is therefore manageable.
But an objective [or as nearly objective as possible, within the frameworks of rational] analysis of Mr Galloway’s ‘contributions’ ABOUT the Muslims in fact shows that he has not been an advocate of the rights of the Muslims in the context of the ideological battle between the colonialists and their victims or targets.
Rather that he has been, and remains, an advocate of the West in all key long term issues and matters.
His apparent departure from the policies of the regimes of GW Bush and Tony Blair occurs on a difference between what he, Mr George Galloway, says should happen on a particular aspect of the policies and what these regimes and their likes do or have done or are still doing.
This applies to Gordon Brown’s UK administration in so far as Brown may still be continuing what in effect and in substance would be the polices of the administration fronted by Tony Blair. After all, it is only four weeks or so since Blair ‘left’ and Gordon Brown officially took over at the official address fronting as the head of the UK administration.
So how is it that Mr Galloway comes across – or has been presented in the Western--controlled and Western imperialists-scripted media as coming across - both as an advocate of the rights of the Muslims as well as being [almost like] any stereotyped fundamentalist Muslim?
This is part of the plan that the media operate when they include Mr Galloway as one of their ‘official’ dissenters "allowed to speak on behalf of the Muslims”!
And as far as the allegations go that Mr Galloway has been a paid mouthpiece of Saddam Hussein or of anyone else, there is less difficulty in coming to a truthful and credible conclusion as to what Mr Galloway has been involved in as a general orientation in that regard.
Mr Galloway has openly taken part in comparatively small scale enterprises which have included references and recommendations as based on or as linked to his engagements and relationships with various parties or quarters near or close to heads of regimes in countries including Iraq.
Evidence of this is found in Mr Galloway’s relationships with the regime – and the person – of Benazir Bhutto from Pakistan.
In fact Mr Galloway is noticeably aptly representative of the viewpoint that would be accurately found in any on the given issue or topic as held by Benazir Bhutto even in 2007.
These small scale enterprises have brought Mr Galloway reasonable income and more to the point, these have allowed Mr Galloway a platform that he would otherwise not have. Platforms that have been used as important references in the colonialists’ propaganda that by their [the colonialists and occupiers] allowing Mr Galloway to speak, they are PROVING that there is freedom of speech for those who do not agree with the colonialists’ policies and practices.
This has been so since Mr Galloway’s present employers – or one set of his present employers outside the House of Commons – those who own the ‘Talksport’ broadcasting business where Mr Galloway hosts a twice weekly weekend phone-in slot broadcast this assertion.
Which is more telling than they would appear to have realised.
For the ‘Talksport’ station is one of the most racist, pro-racism, pro-occupation-of-Iraq outlets that could be found anywhere in the West.
And some of the ‘regulars’ including James Whale, are known promoters of the very same racist ideology that GW Bush in essence would agree with. And Tony Blair would be proud of!
This does not mean that since he got presented with a part-time ‘colleague’ as a co-host of a programme on the same slot, James Whale has not adopted a suitably vague style and phraseology when it comes to accommodating the unique arrangement.
And Mr Galloway has deployed his own presentational skills to complement Whale as his ‘teacher’ which Mr Whale would be immensely aware of, even if it could only have been conceived of and bestowed as a professional fiction!
And James Whale is not, by any stretch of the evidence, the most strident of today’s Talksport presenters!
Some of the things that they daily say and encourage when it comes to the ‘rest of the world generally and the Muslim people in particular’ would not only be identical with those of the BNP and their earlier versions the NF but would in fact be more offensive, more racist, more xenophobic, more anti-Asian, anti-African, anti-immigrant [!] and anti-Muslim than anything the official BNP or the NF would be allowed to include in any of THEIR Party Political Broadcasts on the BBC and on other official UK broadcasting outlets.!
[To be continued]
A brief political biography of Mr George Galloway MP
A brief political biography of Mr George Galloway MP [‘for Bethnal green and Bow’ in the UK House of Commons since May 2005] as composed by a member of the constituency in ‘Bethnal Green and Bow’ written and published at 0230 Hrs GMT on Sunday 29 July 2007
By©Muhammad Haque
0230 Hrs GMT London Sunday 29 July 2007
One of the physical, material and evidential factors that has to be taken into account in assessing the relevant role of the present ‘MP’ for Bethnal Green and Bow, is the fact that he has received wider appearances in the West-controlled media [that has been imposed upon the rest of the world generally and upon Asia in particular in this context] than any other West-centric ‘personality’ or ‘figure’ in the media.
In fact he has been given wider and deeper promotions than ALL the ‘Muslim’-originated activists from all of Asia and Africa have been given in the past 100 years by the Western media and platform-controllers.
This is physically phenomenal in the sheer pervasiveness. But the substance is mercifully far smaller and is therefore manageable.
But an objective [or as nearly objective as possible, within the frameworks of rational] analysis of Mr Galloway’s ‘contributions’ ABOUT the Muslims in fact shows that he has not been an advocate of the rights of the Muslims in the context of the ideological battle between the colonialists and their victims or targets.
Rather that he has been, and remains, an advocate of the West in all key long term issues and matters.
His apparent departure from the policies of the regimes of GW Bush and Tony Blair occurs on a difference between what he, Mr George Galloway, says should happen on a particular aspect of the policies and what these regimes and their likes do or have done or are still doing.
This applies to Gordon Brown’s UK administration in so far as Brown may still be continuing what in effect and subsistence would be the polices of the administration fronted by Tony Blair. After all, it is only four weeks or so since Blair ‘left’ and Gordon Brown officially took up the official address fronting as the head of the UK administration.
So how is it that Mr Galloway comes across – or has been presented in the Western--controlled and Western imperialists-scripted media as coming across - both as an advocate of the rights of the Muslims as well as being [almost like] any stereotyped fundamentalist Muslim?
This is part of the plan that the media operate when they include Mr Galloway as one of their ‘official’ dissenters "allowed to speak on behalf of the Muslims”!
And as far as the allegations go that Mr Galloway has been a paid mouthpiece of Saddam Hussein or of anyone else, there is less difficulty in coming to a truthful and credible conclusion as to what Mr Galloway has been involved in as a general orientation in that regard.
Mr Galloway has openly taken part in comparatively small scale enterprises which have included references and recommendations as based on or as linked to his engagements and relationships with various parties or quarters near or close to heads of regimes in countries including Iraq.
Evidence of this is found in Mr Galloway’s relationships with the regime – and the person – of Benazir Bhutto from Pakistan.
In fact Mr Galloway is noticeably aptly representative of the viewpoint that would be accurately found in any on the given issue or topic as held by Benazir Bhutto even in 2007.
These small scale enterprises have brought Mr Galloway reasonable income and more to the point, these have allowed Mr Galloway a platform that he would otherwise not have. Platforms that have been used as important references in the colonialists’ propaganda that by their [the colonialists and occupiers] allowing Mr Galloway to speak, they are PROVING that there is freedom of speech for those who do not agree with the colonialists’ policies and practices.
This has been so since Mr Galloway’s present employers – or one set of his present employers outside the House of Commons – those who own the ‘Talksport’ broadcasting business where Mr Galloway hosts a twice weekly weekend phone-in slot broadcast this assertion.
Which is more telling than they would appear to have realised.
For the ‘Talksport’ station is one of the most racist, pro-racism, pro-occupation-of-Iraq outlets that could be found anywhere in the West.
And some of the ‘regulars’ including James Whale, are known promoters of the very same racist ideology that GW Bush in essence would agree with. And Tony Blair would be proud of!
This does not mean that since he got presented with a part-time ‘colleague’ as a co-host of a programme on the same slot, James Whale has not adopted a suitably vague style and phraseology when it comes to accommodating the unique arrangement.
And Mr Galloway has deployed his own presentational skills to complement Whale as his ‘teacher’ which Mr Whale would be immensely aware of, even if it could only have been conceived of and bestowed as a professional fiction!
And James Whale is not, by any stretch of the evidence, the most strident of today’s Talksport presenters!
Some of the things that they daily say and encourage when it comes to the ‘rest of the world generally and the Muslim people in particular’ would not only be identical with those of the BNP and their earlier versions the NF but would in fact be more offensive, more racist, more xenophobic, more anti-Asian, anti-African, anti-immigrant [!] and anti-Muslim than anything the official BNP or the NF would be allowed to include in any of THEIR Party Political Broadcasts on the BBC and on other official UK broadcasting outlets.!
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0230 Hrs GMT London Sunday 29 July 2007
One of the physical, material and evidential factors that has to be taken into account in assessing the relevant role of the present ‘MP’ for Bethnal Green and Bow, is the fact that he has received wider appearances in the West-controlled media [that has been imposed upon the rest of the world generally and upon Asia in particular in this context] than any other West-centric ‘personality’ or ‘figure’ in the media.
In fact he has been given wider and deeper promotions than ALL the ‘Muslim’-originated activists from all of Asia and Africa have been given in the past 100 years by the Western media and platform-controllers.
This is physically phenomenal in the sheer pervasiveness. But the substance is mercifully far smaller and is therefore manageable.
But an objective [or as nearly objective as possible, within the frameworks of rational] analysis of Mr Galloway’s ‘contributions’ ABOUT the Muslims in fact shows that he has not been an advocate of the rights of the Muslims in the context of the ideological battle between the colonialists and their victims or targets.
Rather that he has been, and remains, an advocate of the West in all key long term issues and matters.
His apparent departure from the policies of the regimes of GW Bush and Tony Blair occurs on a difference between what he, Mr George Galloway, says should happen on a particular aspect of the policies and what these regimes and their likes do or have done or are still doing.
This applies to Gordon Brown’s UK administration in so far as Brown may still be continuing what in effect and subsistence would be the polices of the administration fronted by Tony Blair. After all, it is only four weeks or so since Blair ‘left’ and Gordon Brown officially took up the official address fronting as the head of the UK administration.
So how is it that Mr Galloway comes across – or has been presented in the Western--controlled and Western imperialists-scripted media as coming across - both as an advocate of the rights of the Muslims as well as being [almost like] any stereotyped fundamentalist Muslim?
This is part of the plan that the media operate when they include Mr Galloway as one of their ‘official’ dissenters "allowed to speak on behalf of the Muslims”!
And as far as the allegations go that Mr Galloway has been a paid mouthpiece of Saddam Hussein or of anyone else, there is less difficulty in coming to a truthful and credible conclusion as to what Mr Galloway has been involved in as a general orientation in that regard.
Mr Galloway has openly taken part in comparatively small scale enterprises which have included references and recommendations as based on or as linked to his engagements and relationships with various parties or quarters near or close to heads of regimes in countries including Iraq.
Evidence of this is found in Mr Galloway’s relationships with the regime – and the person – of Benazir Bhutto from Pakistan.
In fact Mr Galloway is noticeably aptly representative of the viewpoint that would be accurately found in any on the given issue or topic as held by Benazir Bhutto even in 2007.
These small scale enterprises have brought Mr Galloway reasonable income and more to the point, these have allowed Mr Galloway a platform that he would otherwise not have. Platforms that have been used as important references in the colonialists’ propaganda that by their [the colonialists and occupiers] allowing Mr Galloway to speak, they are PROVING that there is freedom of speech for those who do not agree with the colonialists’ policies and practices.
This has been so since Mr Galloway’s present employers – or one set of his present employers outside the House of Commons – those who own the ‘Talksport’ broadcasting business where Mr Galloway hosts a twice weekly weekend phone-in slot broadcast this assertion.
Which is more telling than they would appear to have realised.
For the ‘Talksport’ station is one of the most racist, pro-racism, pro-occupation-of-Iraq outlets that could be found anywhere in the West.
And some of the ‘regulars’ including James Whale, are known promoters of the very same racist ideology that GW Bush in essence would agree with. And Tony Blair would be proud of!
This does not mean that since he got presented with a part-time ‘colleague’ as a co-host of a programme on the same slot, James Whale has not adopted a suitably vague style and phraseology when it comes to accommodating the unique arrangement.
And Mr Galloway has deployed his own presentational skills to complement Whale as his ‘teacher’ which Mr Whale would be immensely aware of, even if it could only have been conceived of and bestowed as a professional fiction!
And James Whale is not, by any stretch of the evidence, the most strident of today’s Talksport presenters!
Some of the things that they daily say and encourage when it comes to the ‘rest of the world generally and the Muslim people in particular’ would not only be identical with those of the BNP and their earlier versions the NF but would in fact be more offensive, more racist, more xenophobic, more anti-Asian, anti-African, anti-immigrant [!] and anti-Muslim than anything the official BNP or the NF would be allowed to include in any of THEIR Party Political Broadcasts on the BBC and on other official UK broadcasting outlets.!
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)